« This Isn't What Plato Had In Mind | Main | Video of the Day, 2/22/07 »

February 21, 2007

Lost: Episode 3.9 Review

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all convictions, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

“The Second Coming”, W.B.Yeats

Had this particular quote running through my head as I watched tonight’s episode, thanks to the pattern on Jack’s kite during his first flashback. The “gyre”-like pattern on the kite, coupled with it looking like a bird upon flight thanks to the power of Bai Ling’s insane cleavage, had me thinking back to this poem. And my parents said wasting all that money on an English degree wasn’t worth it. Ha, Ma. Ha, Pa. I got to reference Yeats in a blog entry. There’s your worth right there.

Not as many things to talk about as the last two weeks, but since “Not in Portland” and “Flashes Before Your Eyes” were designed as “So you’re bored, fine, suck on THIS” by the producers, I can’t complain too much about this week’s entry, “Stranger in a Strange Land”. I was hoping the strange land would be one in which things actually get definitively answered, but the show had “Jack in Thailand” as its interpretation of that title. Oh well.

Onto the review.

You Just Thai’d On My Arms Tonight

I love to spend the initial part of the insta-review on the flashback, but um, to quote Peter Griffin after being shot by the “Pee Wee’s Big Adventure” breakfast machine, “What was the point of all that?” Ostensibly, the point was, “Jack, not shockingly, didn’t take to the divorce and sending his father back to the bottle too well, so he shacked up in a small Thai resort and decided to live life according to ‘Mary Poppins’ showtunes, only forgot to learn to actually fly the damn kit, up to the highest height, so he stalks his rebound babe who may or may not be psychic who eventually gives him half of his tattoed arm.”

And leave it to “Lost” to give an answer, only to take it away. The "sheriff", first name Isabel, last name “Creeps Ryan The Hell Out Since She Keeps Showing Up Out of Nowhere Like Hermione in the filmed version of ‘Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban’”, tells Jack (and us) it says, “He walks amongst us, but he is not one of us.” Oh. OK. I get it. He’s a doctor amongst patients, he’s a leader amongst the Lostaways, he’s a Lostaway amongst the Others. Fine. I’ll accept that. Until Jack immediately replies, “That’s what it says, but it’s not what it means.”

Bwa?

Oh come on! Give me a break! That can’t work as a “deep” reply. That would be up there with me getting pulled over by a cop for running a stop sign, and me replying, “That’s what it says, but not what it means.” Same level of bull. What it’s supposed to mean? Anyone’s guess. Beats me. Makes me angry that I had to look at Bai’s boobies just to get there.

The Funky Bunch

One of the major themes of the episode was the desire, the need, the innate impulse to mark things, to give them names, to give physical representation to the unformed. Jack’s tattoo, Juliet’s brand, Ben’s letter, Karl/Alex’s naming of the constellations…all examples of giving the abstract concrete form. Things that cannot be readily grasped transform by being marked, bringing instant understanding through the act of viewing.

For Jack, the tattoo is a constant reminder of his status, that of the loner. We’ve seen this pre-Island, we’ve seen it on-Island, and it’s informed his decision to essentially stay behind with the Others. Makes sense, if he feels his status is literally written upon him. Something about that encounter with Bai Ling’s massive mammaries cemented his status in his mind. (Getting the holy hell beaten out of him a few hours later by the majority of the village also seemed to convince him.)

Juliet’s brand cements her likewise as “among us, but not one of us”. We’re starting to learn there are various levels of Others as Season 3 has progressed, from lifers such as Ben to recruits such as Juliet to “born into it”s such as Karl, who didn’t know who “The Brady Bunch” were. Teasing out who belongs into which camp will hopefully continue as the season goes on, but it’s worth noting this out loud at this juncture of the series.

One more English major thing that sprung out: J.L Austin's "How To Do Things With Words", specifically, "performative utterances", in which language in fact, for lack of a longer explaination, does things versus merely describing them. As such, words have actual power in the world. (Given that one of Austin's primary examples of this, marriage vows, is reflected in this season's sixth episode title, "I Do", I think it's worth reading up on your Austin as a primer for the rest of the season.)

Are You “Kid”ding Me?

If there’s one thing I’d like to do, it’s to teach the world to sing. I mean, that Coke ad was totally onto something there. But if I could tack on one more thing, it would be the ability to gather up all the promo people for all the major networks, put them in a room, and them bomb the heck out of that room. That way we won’t get promos like “Tonight, answers to three questions you’ve been asking!” only to half-answer one and give a big “Neener neener” to the others two.

If you’ve seen any trailer for this episode, you knew Stewardess Cindy was back, as well as the kids, and they would be joined by a few people who looked like they had dropped acid and were hearing a Phish jam in their heads. And after watching the episode…well, you knew basically exactly the same thing. Why was Cindy there? Why were the kids there? I wanted to know! And I still don’t. It’s a bad sign when a character on the show (in this case, jack), gives a “You know what, screw all y’all” as a response to another’s non-responses. Characters on shows should not vent the audience’s frustration unless Joss Whedon’s writing the meta-dialogue, and even then, sparing use is best.

We know the kids ain’t dead, we know these are the same kids that walked past Eko and Jin in Season 2 (thanks to UBIQUITIOUS TEDDY BEAR® 3000), and that the Others took them to provide a better life than the Lostaways could produce. Maybe The Others saw Hurley, and thought he’s pull a “Get in mah belly!” routine like Fat Bastard in those “Austin Powers” movies. But I don’t know. Because their appearance answered jack squat. Again, I’m not blaming the producers/writers for this. I am sure they didn’t OK the promo for this episode. But I wanted to know more. Like, for instance, why the last time I saw that teddy bear, it was shown accompanied to lots of dirty, bare feet, just below nasty, tattered clothing, walking silently through thick jungle. I want to know that! Instead, all I got was Stewardess Cindy, constantly looking at the hidden camera, as if she was sure someone from “Cheaters” was filming her chat with Jack.

The Second Coming (of “The Second Coming”)

So, what to make of an episode that ended with Jack on the same boat Tom et al used to kidnap Walt, hanging out with Juliet at the stern, looking as if they were about to re-enact scenes from “Titanic”?

Let me once again give you the opening lines of the Yeats poem...

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all convictions, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Given the show’s propensity for hitting you over the head with visual clues, I think the spirals on Jack’s kite are important. They don’t have to literally represent the Yeats poem, to be sure, but the Dharma Initiative’s attempts to stop the “blood-dimmed tide” from being “loosed” is well-documented within the mythology of the show. And the “worst” (to date, The Others) are certainly ripe with “passionate intensity”.

Furthermore, the power struggle at the heart of the Others, in other words, its “centre”, “cannot hold”. The introduction of Isabel into the power mix upsets an already delicate balance. Ben’s power is certainly within question, the “falconer” unable to fully communicate with the “falcon” (in other words, the rest of the Others). The ties are far from severed, but the spiral, the gyre, moves out, ever “widening”.

A reach? Certainly. A willful grafting of an unrelated poem onto the show in order to seem intellectual? Perhaps. But just as the show throws in dozens upon dozens of literary and cultural references into the show, I think it’s a mistake to merely dismiss the themes within the poem as being unrelated to this episode, and indeed, “Lost” as a whole. By the end of the show, structurally, both sides are regrouping, heading back to home base, with both sides having suffered losses. Kate/Sawyer’s journey home parallels the return home of the Others. From there, both sides will regroup, restructure, and once again cross paths again, sooner than later. The ceremony of innocence is truly drowned, and mere anarchy lies ahead.

I just hope there are enough people still watching when that climatic battle happens.

***

To listen to the podcast for this episode, and to listen to all podcasts relating to Season 3 of "Lost", please click this link. You can listen to individual episodes there, or subscribe to my podcast on iTunes from there as well.

Posted by Ryan McGee at February 21, 2007 11:58 PM

Comments

Surely the second coming is at hand.

This episode really disappointed me because of the hype. I probably would have enjoyed it more if I wasn't waiting for them to answer questions. I wish I could sit back and enjoy the show this season, but the network's persistence to over-dramatize for people to tune in has been distracting me. I will continue to take the abuse and watch the show until the end, but I'm worried about the show’s ratings when viewers who won't tolerate playing these games give up.

Anyways, I have really enjoyed your blog. I discovered it through iTunes at the beginning of this season and have been listening / reading since. Thanks for giving me a chance to revisit my book of modern poems. Who says TV makes you dumber?

—Adam

Posted by: Adam at February 23, 2007 05:33 PM

please tell me someone is going to mention when ben said that we are going to go home now to where we live. does this mean back to regular cicilization or does it mean another island? is there three islands? i'm getting way too old for this stress. they very obviously got on a boat which means back to home has to involve some sort of water travel. Or is their actual home on the same island as the losties. I know for a fact that this show is going to kill me. When the rest of the losties go to rescue jack are they going to find an empty island?

Posted by: danny at February 25, 2007 05:42 PM

Hey, Ryan - thought that you might find this little dissertation I compiled of various posts concerning 'SIASL' of some interest. Really liked your connecting aspects of it to the Yeats poem and can see most of your reasoning, but as my efforts suggest, it's Jack who is the bird-figure.....let me know what you think for sure!

James


This may have been the most revealing episode of all this season, building as it does upon the previous two - let me know all your thoughts as you care to share them!

Jim

For your consideration.....

The Expanded Meaning of 'NAMASTE'

'The Spirit in me meets the same Spirit in you.

I greet that place where you and I are one.

I salute the Light of life in you.

I receive the free spirit in you.

I recognize that within each of us is a place where peace dwells, and when we are in that place, we are One.

My energy salutes your energy.

The life in me sees and honors the life in you.

May the life within you be strong.

The light within me sees and honors the light within you.'

So Candle/Wickman's blessing, like so much on LOST, was hardly frivolous or an exercise in
pleasantries.....


1st post, Thursday:

Last night's episode seems to be provoking the most polarized reactions yet. Personally, I feel that it might be the season's best (yes, just a little bit better than 'Flashes....." - don't hate me!) and I enjoyed this Jack-centric installment more than any other. There was a great deal revealed, some of which fueled my growing suspicion that the island's original
inhabitants were one of Israel's Lost Tribes - we got a good look at how the Others dispense justice, and in a way, I see Juliet's branding as a way of freeing her up to leave by making her persona non grata. Karl yet again recited a very specific line from Scripture, too.....(NOTE: to wit, 'God loves Jacob as He loves you', which had already appeared in a behavior conditioning video).

As for the foreshadowed consequences of Jack being
'marked' by Aschara, he violated her every bit -
betrayed her trust - as surely as if he had resorted to sexual assault, denying her the opportunity to give him 'the gift'. Jack demonstrated his thoroughly disturbing tendency of demanding what he wants regardless of the outcome - and yes, there's no doubt that a lot of his resolve was as a result of pent-up frustration at Sarah's refusal to tell him anything. That said, at its heart this was a clash between 2 people who instinctively need to maintain control and Aschara got even in the end with the help of her family.

2nd post:

Just posted this, my final take on "Strangers In A
Strange Land", to thetailsection.com; don't expect it to change anybody's opinions if the other boards are any indication.....

The real-world Chinese meaning behind Jack's tattoo is not, 'A stranger walks among us, but is not OF us' but rather, 'Who masters Fate's rise and descent'? A good question for this show, and the answer is, of course, we all do as ostensibly possessing of free will. Far more meaningful than another interpretation. 'Eagles fly, cleave the sky' - or IS it? What that expression may be trying to convey is that Jack, or any person
believing that Fate/Destiny can be controlled (the
eagle) succeeds on the strength of that belief - but, as Aschara portends, there are consequences,
frequently unknown, that come with doing so. If
Fate/Destiny is but a flight plan for one's life that can be rewritten simply when one realizes as much and has some subconscious knowledge of, then following one's free will can be seen as 'flying by the seat of your pants' in comparison - so often we don't know what the consequences will be but it's still essential to risk them for a life meaningful to us personally, what we learn about Faith as a result of our choices. Ultimately, faith is knowledge of our true dynamic nature and the universal power available to us all.

This is an inherently disturbing line of reasoning, as it suggests that resisting Fate is unhealthy - and Jack can certainly attest to that, what with the beating he received from Aschara's family! But it's the WAYS and battles we choose to resist Fate/Destiny that are important - some more effective than others, and the most interesting aspect of "Stranger In A Strange Land" is the power struggle between two people for whom control is everything: Jack, like most men of Science, believes that 'well-informed is well-armed'
and that specific knowledge will give him all he needs to succeed and rise up to cleave the seemingly immutable, eternal sky no matter what the outcome, finally feeling better about himself far above his father's boozy path. Aschara is very protective of her 'gift' because it is a source of power and control over how she views herself as contrasted against the seedy Phuket red-light district backdrop. When Jack forces her to tell him of what she sees and 'mark' him accordingly - deny her the pleasure of choosing to give it of her own free will, he in effect steals that
power and robs Aschara of her elevated self-esteem, leaving her feeling no better than the desperate, unseemly people just outside her sanctuary. It, and she, have been violated just as surely as if Jack had resorted to sexual assault, which is why she tells her brother and family of the experience and gets even when Jack the Eagle (also a superficial reference to his being American?) is, in a sense, struck down from
his sky, his own artificially higher station,
repeatedly, but perhaps he was sufficiently wounded by Sarah's defiance of his hunger for knowing and thus open to what will likely be a huge catalyst for transformative change, just as on the island (the Others have served to remind him in various ways of just who he really is). A further supposition about the complete tattoo: if the '5' does in fact represent those 5 fateful minutes when Jack's fear was kept at bay in surgery, then the starlike design may be
likewise something to guide this eagle by.....

NOTE: I seem to recall that Bai Ling was contracted for two more episodes, and suspect that there is much more to this story than we're told in Episode 3:09.....


3rd post, and previous replies:

Dear James--

You're right about all this, of course; but there is more lurking there. Aschara accepts her role, Jack accepts his beating, and the entire episode between them is a highly ordered ritual, a sacred act between two willing beings. Neither one is a victim. Aschara becomes a high priestess in the proceedings, and she does not say no or put a stop to it, when she certainly could have. The number five is highly numinous, relating to healing and transformation.

And a great part of wisdom is accepting one's own
personal "fate", "destiny", or whatever you want to call it. In Jungian terms it amounts to a mature accepting of one's role in everything, no matter how unsavory that becomes; of taking responsibility for one's acts; and of a withdrawal of projections on others. It's a huge undertaking and not easily accomplished.

In Christian terms it is called taking up one's cross. The "accident", and the Island, seem to be about Second Chances, of redemption, purgatory, whatever. These people, like all of us, have flubbed their lives up big time and need the chance, the space, to look at themselves and their actions from a bit of a distance, to acquire a new perspective. Also they all seem to be needing, or required, to care about some other person
more than themselves. So they are being given the
opportunity for self-sacrifice as a means to
redemption. As individuals, though, all of them react differently to this opportunity.

Bonita


Thank you so much for the added perspective, Bonita - so in essence, the sado-masochistic little dance between Jack and Aschara is but one more expression of NAMASTE's deeper meaning. While neither may be conscious of precisely why such consequences are visited upon them, their higher selves recognize that they must undergo - may even be ready for - their baptism under.....adversity - and accordingly provoke it as each other's catalysts for transformation despite seeming as but the perpetuation of an unhealthy belief system, bringing to mind the old adage, 'when the student is ready, the teacher will appear'. Or, to put it another way, a strange land is frequently the exact territory a stranger needs to explore and seeks to discover: who they are and why, which neatly links it to Desmond's reverie as
well. Concerning the 'taking up of one's cross', that can have both good and bad connotations if additional, more desirable potentialities fail to be recognized, but laudable if accepting it benefits the greater good - ultimately, it is each person's choice alone. Sidney Carton made it in "A Tale Of Two Cities". Hmmmmmmmm.....why does that title sound familiar?

Also, as in so many previous instances, LOST and the writers are again exhorting the viewer to identify the reasons for beliefs, about themselves, others and their environments (witnessed, of course, by Jack's retort to Isabel on the beach, "that's what it says, but that ISN'T what it MEANS" - which is entirely for OUR benefit, since the stated meaning is factually
false).

What could have provoked such a savage beating, for no readily obvious reason? This extremely subtle truth, that Jack and Aschara were merely fulfilling each other's deepest hopes (missed by so many blogging viewers) is hinted at by both Tom's sarcastic retort to Jack about stones for glass houses - i.e., the familiar admonishment of 'judge not - even those deserving of judgement - or arrive at and act upon partially-informed conclusions, lest ye be judged' and another Old Testament value, 'an eye for an eye', in
direct reference to Juliet's ORIGINAL fate and own
power struggle with Ben. Must the universe's seeming propensity for relative equalization - balance - be undeniable law? Just what all the reasons are for The Others' actions remains to be determined; another idea that we're being exposed to is that, whether we believe certain behaviors to be right - more accurately, 'rational' - or wrong, in the end others' beliefs about them are of far more importance.

Jack may then experience his Phuket flashback because he subsequently gained a deeper understanding of human nature and why he was beaten at Aschara's behest on the beach - he even EXPECTED it at his basest level, to serve a self-hating perspective. This time on the
island, however, he's able to recognize how resisting a seemingly immutable fate is a worthy risk, absolutely essential to save someone that matters to him - affects his fate, and likely that of everyone else, even if some of them may not realize it yet - in more ways than one. Again there are echoes of the decision that Desmond was led to make - rightly?

Sorry, Bonita - this show just has so many layers that it's hard not to find myself lost in them, and that can't be a bad thing! This episode was incredibly rich with insight. Thanks again.....

James

Posted by: ogam5 - James at March 16, 2007 09:56 AM

Good stuff, please check out my site, too. Thanks! Todd

Posted by: Todd Hostager at March 16, 2007 07:16 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?